Post by Admin on Jul 19, 2011 21:15:07 GMT
The Beckhams have upset the elite with having to many children.
With a fourth child, the couple have joined the ranks of the irresponsible, population experts say.
Whats a cheek this man has so much money he could have 50 kids and it wouldn't put a dent in his bank account, it would like throwing a penny in the ocean. What the problem here is they are not conforming with the elite plan to shrink the population to a manageable number that is easily controlled and managed.
The guardian co.uk has the full story
As the world's population is due to hit seven billion at some point in the next few days, there is an increasing call for the UK to open a public debate about how many children people have.
Now the Green MP, Caroline Lucas, has joined other leading environmentalists in calling for the smashing of what TV zoologist Sir David Attenborough has called the "absurd taboo" in discussing family size in the UK.
Lucas said: "We need to have a far greater public debate about population, whether it focuses on improving family planning or reducing global inequality – and looking again at how we address the strain on our natural resources. The absence of an open and honest discussion about this issue means most people don't give much thought to the scale of global population growth in recent years. In 1930, just one or two generations ago, the world's population stood at around two billion. Today it is around seven billion, and by 2050 it is projected to rise by a third to 9 billion.
The Beckhams, and others like London mayor Boris Johnson, are very bad role models with their large families. There's no point in people trying to reduce their carbon emissions and then increasing them 100% by having another child," he said. "England is one of the most densely populated countries in the world and the fastest-growing in population terms in Europe. In 15 years we'll have an extra 10 million people here."
There are certain advantages to having big family, I myself come from a big family, and it's a beautiful thing.
New World Order upset.
With a fourth child, the couple have joined the ranks of the irresponsible, population experts say.
Whats a cheek this man has so much money he could have 50 kids and it wouldn't put a dent in his bank account, it would like throwing a penny in the ocean. What the problem here is they are not conforming with the elite plan to shrink the population to a manageable number that is easily controlled and managed.
The guardian co.uk has the full story
As the world's population is due to hit seven billion at some point in the next few days, there is an increasing call for the UK to open a public debate about how many children people have.
Now the Green MP, Caroline Lucas, has joined other leading environmentalists in calling for the smashing of what TV zoologist Sir David Attenborough has called the "absurd taboo" in discussing family size in the UK.
Lucas said: "We need to have a far greater public debate about population, whether it focuses on improving family planning or reducing global inequality – and looking again at how we address the strain on our natural resources. The absence of an open and honest discussion about this issue means most people don't give much thought to the scale of global population growth in recent years. In 1930, just one or two generations ago, the world's population stood at around two billion. Today it is around seven billion, and by 2050 it is projected to rise by a third to 9 billion.
The Beckhams, and others like London mayor Boris Johnson, are very bad role models with their large families. There's no point in people trying to reduce their carbon emissions and then increasing them 100% by having another child," he said. "England is one of the most densely populated countries in the world and the fastest-growing in population terms in Europe. In 15 years we'll have an extra 10 million people here."
There are certain advantages to having big family, I myself come from a big family, and it's a beautiful thing.
New World Order upset.